• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

The Chinese Eating Disorder Brief Screening Scale (CEDBS): Development and Psychometric Validation in General and Clinical Populations

ABSTRACT

Objective

Despite growing recognition of eating disorders (EDs) as a public health concern in China, validated instruments suitable for efficient large-scale screening remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate the Chinese Eating Disorder Brief Screening Scale (CEDBS).

Method

Scale development and validation were structured across two studies. Study 1 involved item generation and refinement through expert evaluation, cognitive interviews, and a pilot study (N = 146). Study 2 examined psychometric properties in large non-clinical (N = 3573) and clinical (N = 325) samples. Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for construct validity, McDonald’s ω and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for reliability, Pearson correlations for convergent and discriminant validity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for screening accuracy.

Results

The final 10-item CEDBS demonstrated a unidimensional structure, high internal consistency (ω = 0.95), and acceptable test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.81). CEDBS scores correlated strongly with established ED-specific measures (eating disorder inventory subscales: rs = 0.51–0.87; eating disorder examination-questionnaire global score: r = 0.74; eating attitudes test-26: r = 0.81) and showed a moderate correlation with the anxiety scale (r = 0.35), supporting discriminant validity. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.88, with an optimal cutoff of 16.5 (sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.84).

Discussion

The CEDBS demonstrates preliminary psychometric support as a brief screening tool for identifying probable ED cases in Chinese populations. An integer cutoff score of 17 may be considered for practical use.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 07/14/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice