• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Abortion exceptionalism in research governance: why naming the problem matters

Background

Abortion remains an exceptionalised form of healthcare. In a context shaped by global rollbacks of reproductive rights and heightened political scrutiny of sexual and reproductive healthcare, it is increasingly governed as uniquely risky, sensitive and contentious.1 Abortion exceptionalism is well documented in relation to law, medical curricula, policy and clinical provision.2–5 Less attention, however, has been paid to how this exceptionalism increasingly shapes the conditions under which abortion research itself is conducted.

As an interdisciplinary group of researchers of abortion, contraception and sexual and reproductive health, we have observed a subtle but significant intensification of abortion exceptionalism in recent years. In this Personal View, we argue that this exceptionalism is being reproduced through research governance processes, including ethics review and expectations around public and patient involvement and engagement. These shifts have implications not only for service provision, but for what…

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 04/07/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice