• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Examining suicide in ‘pro‐choice suicide’ forums: A cyclical model

Abstract

Objectives

This study examined real-time, unobtrusive accounts of suicidal distress shared by online forum users and developed a process framework to advance understanding and inform prevention efforts.

Design

A large pro-choice suicide discussion forum (150,000+ users) was selected to capture and analyse contemporaneous accounts of the suicide process, offering real-time, anonymous and minimally filtered disclosures less influenced by recall bias than retrospective interviews.

Methods

A directed qualitative content analysis was conducted on publicly available posts (N = 526) describing suicidal distress or behaviour, categorizing content into current states (e.g. ideation, action), associated emotions and motivations.

Results

The Cyclical Model of Suicide (CMS) emerged as a non-linear, bidirectional framework characterized by non-sequential state transitions and recurrent movement. The model includes six states (non-suicidal distress, suicidal ideation, ambivalence, resolution, suicide in progress and recovery), a Reversal mechanism (regression to prior states) and ‘incident drivers’ (triggering shifts to higher-distress states and contributing to recurrence and state-bypassing).

Conclusions

This study offers four insights. First, it uses in-the-moment accounts to propose a process-oriented framework rather than relying on retrospective reports. Second, it highlights recurrence language, with users describing experiences as cyclical. Third, it captures Reversal as a short-term shift away from action. Finally, it emphasizes the use of anonymous pro-choice suicide online spaces for venting and support before suicidal desire crystallizes into intent, highlighting that many users may be turning to these platforms instead of traditional therapeutic settings.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 07/20/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice