• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

The Potential Ambiguity of Negative Questions in Children’s Testimony

ABSTRACT

This study assessed the potential ambiguity of child witnesses’ responses to different types of negative questions. We coded the testimony of 134 5- to 17-year-olds for five types of questions that included negative terms (N = 3542), including negative declarative questions (e.g., “You weren’t scared?”), three subtypes of tag questions (e.g., “You weren’t scared, right?”), and high negatives (e.g., “Weren’t you scared?”). With the exception of high negatives, most responses were unelaborated yeses and noes, which rendered children’s responses potentially ambiguous. Examination of children’s elaborations demonstrated interchangeability for three of the question types, such that their unelaborated yes and no responses could convey either a positive (“Yes, I was scared”/“No, I was scared”) or negative response (“Yes, I wasn’t scared”/“No, I wasn’t scared”). Attorneys sought to disambiguate less than 1% of potentially ambiguous responses.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 04/06/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice