• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Identifying Bariatric Surgery Patients With the Most Favorable Cost Outcomes

ABSTRACT

Objective

To examine whether the economic benefits of bariatric surgery differ by patient subgroups, with the aim of identifying those that may yield the most favorable cost profile for improved return on investment in an exploratory analysis.

Study Setting and Design

To identify patient subgroups via the “mTree” (matching + decision tree) method, we conducted analyses of total expenditures 3 years after surgery in a retrospective cohort of 16,538 bariatric patients and 16,538 matched non-surgical patients.

Data Sources and Analytic Sample

This study used electronic health records from Kaiser Permanente, an integrated health system, from 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2019. The cohort was randomly divided into training and test samples, and differences in median total expenditures within each subgroup were then estimated in a held-out test sample. We adapted a novel causal machine learning method mTree, previously developed for randomized trial data, to characterize heterogeneous treatment effects of bariatric surgery on total healthcare expenditures in a non-randomized observational study. This approach combines pair-matching and conditional inference trees to identify subgroups of patients with differential treatment effects while maintaining within-subgroup balance on important confounders.

Principal Findings

Significant heterogeneity in the effect of bariatric surgery on total expenditures was observed across the eight identified patient subgroups, which were masked by a null average treatment effect. Five of eight subgroups identified in the training sample were replicated in the test sample, and patients using insulin with a Gagne score ≤ 4 had some of the greatest post-surgical expenditure reductions (−$4311, 95% CI: [−$6154, −$2504]).

Conclusions

Subgroup identification is critical for providing context to average treatment effects by identifying patients who may generate a more (or less) promising return on investment. Patients from subgroups with more favorable post-surgical cost profiles may inform prioritization for bariatric surgery if these subgroups are validated in independent cohorts.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 04/18/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice