• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Improving the Outlook for Infectious Disease Control in the United States Through State‐Led Initiatives

Policy Points

This is a pivotal time for state leaders and policymakers to lean into opportunities to enhance infectious disease control in the United States.
There are extensive opportunities for state-led initiatives to be influential in the areas of public health infectious disease detection, public health funding, and public health infrastructure.
It is imperative to remember that “all responses are local” and that the ultimate authority to detect, investigate, control, and prevent the spread of infectious diseases in the United States falls to states.

Context

Over the last decade, the United States has encountered numerous infectious disease-related public health threats, observed declines in life expectancy and childhood vaccination rates, and experienced rapid changes and reorganizations to the domestic public health system. There is a window of opportunity for state leaders and policymakers to strengthen state, tribal, local, and territorial public health infrastructure amidst a changing federal landscape in order to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States.

Methods

This perspective synthesizes evidence from the public health literature and draws on the collective experience of the authors working in the applied public health field. We offer considerations for state leaders and policymakers to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States though state-led initiatives and direction.

Findings

Although many public health activities related to infectious disease detection, investigation, control, and prevention are funded and directed by federal public health authorities, state, tribal, local, and territorial health departments have held the legal authority for this work since the early 19th century. Recent changes and relative instability at the federal level are noteworthy; however, “all responses are local” and the ultimate authority to detect, investigate, control, and prevent the spread of infectious diseases in the United States falls to states.

Conclusions

State leaders have a duty and responsibility to protect the health of their population and ensure a posture of readiness to effectively respond to infectious disease health threats. States can step forward and embrace innovation in this space to ensure optimized infectious disease control in the United States prior to the next emerging infectious disease public health threat.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 09/05/2026 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice