Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, Vol 17(4), May 2025, 705-712; doi:10.1037/tra0001618
Objective: Trauma exposure—a contributor to psychological risk for refugee youth—is typically assessed using cumulative indices; however, recent findings indicate that trauma type may better predict psychological outcomes. This study investigated the utility of two methods of classifying trauma exposure—cumulative trauma and exposure to specific types of trauma (i.e., trauma subtypes)—in predicting the severity of symptoms related to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety for refugee youth. Method: 96 Syrian and Iraqi youth resettled as refugees in the United States self-reported trauma exposure and psychological symptoms. Multiple regression was used to assess the variance in symptom severity explained by specific trauma subtypes (i.e., victimization, death threat, and accidental/injury) as compared to cumulative trauma scores. Results: Multiple regression models predicting PTSD revealed cumulative trauma (b = 0.07; p = .004) and death threat trauma (b = 0.16; p = .001) as significant predictors of PTSD symptom severity; notably, death threat trauma was the only subtype associated with PTSD and explained more variance than cumulative trauma scores (10.3% and 8.4%, respectively). Cumulative trauma, but no specific trauma subtype, was associated with anxiety (b = .03; p = .043); however, this relation did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusion: Focused trauma assessment—particularly consideration of death threat trauma and cumulative trauma exposures—may be useful in evaluating the risk of PTSD symptoms in refugee youth, whereas symptoms related to anxiety may be driven by other factors. These findings can be leveraged toward focused identification of youth at highest risk for PTSD symptoms, to improve prevention and early intervention efforts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)