• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Impact of reduced chlamydia testing on STI testing and provider preferences in the Netherlands: an experimental vignette study

Objectives

The restrictive chlamydia testing guidelines for asymptomatic individuals at Dutch sexual health centres (SHCs) since January 2025 may influence perceptions and attitudes towards testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This study aimed to assess the potential impact of this guideline change on STI testing preferences among young people and to examine determinants and underlying motivations of these preferences.

Methods

Heterosexuals aged 16–34 in the Netherlands, recruited via social media and SHCs, completed an online survey (April–June 2024). STI testing preferences (SHCs, general practitioners (GPs), commercial self-sampling tests or not testing) before and after the anticipated guideline change were assessed in a hypothetical scenario involving condomless sex with a new partner without having STI-related symptoms after. Participants initially preferring SHCs were grouped according to post-change preferences. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with preferences and thematic analysis to explore motivations.

Results

Of 1179 participants, 68% (95% CI 65% to 71%) initially preferred SHCs as a testing provider. After the guideline change, among this group, 24.2% (95% CI 21% to 27%) still preferred SHCs, 51.5% (95% CI 48% to 55%) switched to a preference for testing at GPs, 18% (95% CI 16% to 21%) to self-sampling and 6.2% (95% CI 5% to 8%) opted out. Switching to GPs was associated with younger age and high self-efficacy and control beliefs; choosing self-sampling with older age (>24) and university education; and opting out with inconsistent condom use and low health goals compared with preferring SHCs. Motivations included test costs, symptom absence and perceived chlamydia prevalence.

Conclusion

Changing chlamydia testing guidelines at SHCs may cause a shift in testing preferences to GPs or self-sampling and may discourage some from testing. These findings underscore the need for targeted communication and ongoing monitoring of STI testing behaviour to maintain STI testing uptake and are relevant for countries facing similar changes to chlamydia testing guidelines.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 12/17/2025 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice