Translational Issues in Psychological Science, Vol 10(1), Mar 2024, 21-34; doi:10.1037/tps0000388
A common approach to building social cohesion involves programming that fosters contact between social groups. However, some scholars are wary of this approach, suggesting that instead of seeking to promote improved attitudes and greater cohesion between groups through contact, efforts should first focus on addressing and achieving greater social equality and change. In light of these debates, the present review will compare and contrast two types of intergroup contact—positive contact and supportive contact—in terms of their short- and long-term implications for social cohesion and social change. We then highlight the importance of these implications for practitioners to consider when designing contact-based programs, and we offer recommendations for future research and practice to maximize the likelihood of achieving desired outcomes and minimize the potential for unintentional harm. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)