• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

The Health Improvement Profile for people with severe mental illness: Feasibility of a secondary analysis to make international comparisons

Accessible Summary

What is already known about this topic?

Individuals with severe mental illness (SMI) have elevated risks for physical health problems and low screening rates.

No previous studies have compared the physical health promotion needs of people with SMI using the same screening tool across different international settings.

What this paper adds to existing knowledge?

It appears feasible to use the HIP to profile and compare physical health‐related risks in people with SMI across different international settings.

The HIP tool identified significant differences in areas of risk across the four countries.

What are the implications for practice?

The HIP could be used to identify unique clusters of health promotion needs in different countries.

Use of HIP health checks may support implementation of individualized interventions.

Abstract

Introduction

To date, no studies have contrasted physical health profiles of people with severe mental illness (SMI) in different countries.

Aim

To evaluate feasibility of using the Health Improvement Profile (HIP) to compare and contrast physical health and health behaviours of people with SMI from four countries.

Method

An observational feasibility study using secondary analysis of pooled health state and lifestyle data. Physical health checks using modified versions of HIP were administered in four countries.

Results

Findings suggest feasibility of HIP screening to profile and compare physical health and health behaviours of people with SMI across international settings. High overall numbers of risk items (red flags) were identified in all but the Thailand sample. Despite some commonalities, there were important differences in health profiles across countries.

Discussion

This is the first study to demonstrate feasibility of the HIP to compare health risks in individuals with SMI across countries. Future multi‐national HIP studies should recruit a fully powered stratified random sample of people with SMI that is representative of each setting.

Implications for practice

It appears feasible to utilize the HIP to identify specific areas of health risk in different countries, which may help to better focus nursing interventions and use of resources.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 03/12/2021 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice