Abstract
Background
The new health supervision guidelines emphasize the importance of surveillance or a formal developmental screening test at 4 years, one of the most used tests is Ages & Stages Questionnaire. Nevertheless, there is still not enough evidence whether these tools will be useful to predict future school performance (SP).
Objectives
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the Ages & Stages Questionnaire 3rd edition 48‐month interval (ASQ3‐48) translated to Spanish for predicting the need for school intervention (SI) and poor SP at 8–9 years of age, in late preterm infants (LPIs) and term‐born infants (Terms) and to compare the prevalence of SI and poor SP in the two groups.
Methods
Data were collected from a cohort of 75 LPIs and 58 Terms assessed with ASQ3‐48 and with a further assessment of academic results at 8–9 years, through a standardized school test of the Education Department of Catalonia. SI data were obtained through a parent report. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated, and logistic regression analysis was used.
Results
The prevalence of poor SP was 12.8%, without statistically significant differences between LPIs and Terms. LPIs had higher SI than Terms (29.3% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.001). AUC for poor SP was 0.73 and for receiving SI was 0.56 without differences between the two groups. The sensitivity of the ASQ3‐48 for poor SP was 41%, for specificity 92%, and for receiving SI 14% and 89%, respectively. Poor SP was related to having positive screening in the ASQ3‐48 (OR 6.5 [95% CI, 1.9–22.2]) while having received SI was related to late prematurity (OR 3.6 [95% CI, 1.3–9.6]).
Conclusions
The ASQ3‐48 shows acceptable predictive properties for poor SP but not for receiving SI. No differences were found in SP between LPI and Term cohorts, but LPIs are likelier to require SI.