• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Improving the quality of mortality review equity reporting: Development of an Indigenous Māori responsiveness rubric

Abstract
Objective

To improve consistency in New Zealand’s Mortality Review Committees’ (MRCs) analysis, interpretation, and recommendations, specifically related to equity and Māori (the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand) mortality.

Design

A qualitative Plan-Do-Check-Act design informed by Māori expertise to develop a rubric and guidelines. The rubric and guidelines aimed to improve MRCs’ capability to analyse mortality data, its interpretation and the recommendations for preventing deaths.

Setting

New Zealand’s Mortality Review Committees (MRCs) make recommendations to address preventable deaths. Variation existed between the MRCs’ understanding of equity, and its application to reduce avoidable mortality for Māori, which subsequently influenced their analysis, reporting and the recommendations generated. Improving the quality and robustness of MRCs’ recommendations and reporting are crucial for improving equity.

Participants

Māori Caucus (comprising MRC members with Māori health and wellbeing expertise) designed the rubric and guidelines with input from the secretariat and other MRC Chairs and members.

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

None.

Results

The rubric comprises four key pou (metaphorical posts or domains) (Tika (doing things right); Manaakitanga (caring compassionately); Mana (status, authority); and Mahi tahi (working collaboratively); and criteria for three levels of practice. Evaluation of the efficacy of the use of the rubric and its implementation showed further education and support was required.

Conclusions

A shared understanding of equity about mortality is required. Effective implementation of a quality-based rubric into practice requires careful planning and ongoing education and support for staff and committee members at multiple levels. Follow-up support is needed to support its implementation into practice.

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 08/02/2020 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice