• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

Justice Secretary launches fresh crackdown on crime in prison






This week the Justice Secretary outlined plans to make prisons safer, disrupt criminality within the estate and promote rehabilitation. He announced a £30 million package of new initiatives  including a digital analysis tool to identify those likely to be most dangerous;  better scanners to improve searching; and, in-cell telephones to incentivise good behaviour by giving inmates more contact with their families. The question is – will it work?

The task of turning round prisons is significant. On the same day the Justice Secretary made his announcement, the dire condition of the estate was reported by Peter Clarke, HM Inspector of Prisons. The picture is one of violence increasing, hygiene in decline, reoffending rates stubbornly high and drugs readily available. As the report says plainly, ‘Prisons are still becoming less safe. Improvement has yet to materialise’.

Beyond the yearly snapshot from the Inspectorate the facts are more daunting still. Over the last few years assaults on staff have increased by nearly 90%. Despite some recent improvement, self-inflicted deaths are at historically high levels. The prison population has risen by over 80 per cent in 30 years and now stands at over 85,000 – bigger than Burnley or Guildford.

Given the scale of the challenge, the latest initiatives are unlikely to be the last word on this subject. Prison officer numbers are being increased, after years of cuts to staff numbers.  With, however, a predicted 40 per cent reduction in the Ministry of Justice budget between 2011 and 2020, much more serious and imaginative work will be required.

So what else should be considered? Changing behaviour can be a difficult task – especially if someone is using drugs, fears for their life or has the reading age of 7 years old (half of prisoners are functionally illiterate) – worse if they suffer all three.  Yet it can be done.

Lessons from community sentences in the US, know as ‘swift and certain’, show that when offenders face the consequences for their actions soon after the infraction, they are less likely to reoffend. Importantly, the consequences must by predictable – arbitrary responses encourage risk-taking on the part of offenders. Such programmes have achieved much higher rates of improving behaviour including reductions in drug taking by over 70 per cent.

Relationships and respect matter too. Changing the behaviour of prisoners requires them to respect the staff – which swift and certain measures can help achieve – but also for the staff to show they are invested in helping the prisoner in turning his life around (95% of the prison population are male). Such an approach has been seen some of the most difficult schools transformed and is used by the most successful addiction treatment centres.

This will only work, however, in a clean, safe environment – and here Mr Gauke’s announcement  is welcome. To stand a chance of rehabilitating a serious number of the more than 85,000 people in English and Welsh prisons, drugs must be kept out, rubbish and filth cleared away, and order restored. This won’t be sufficient, but it is a necessary first step.

Author

Stay Up To Date

  • Join Our Mailing List

Support Us

  • Support Our Work

Policy Projects

  • Britain In The World
  • Integration Hub
  • Judicial Power Project
  • Liveable London

Policy Areas

  • Crime and Justice
  • Demography, Immigration and Integration
  • Economics and Social Policy
  • Education
  • Environment and Energy
  • Foreign Policy and Security
  • Government and Politics
  • Housing and Urban Regeneration
  • Industrial Strategy
  • International Trade
  • Security and Extremism

Latest Tweets

RT @Ofstednews This week Ofsted’s Chief inspector, @amanda_spielman gave a speech to the think tank Policy Exchange. You can read it back here. ow.ly/PGj730kSLyj pic.twitter.com/PknZ…

RT @JohnHemmings2 Excellent report on @NATO by @GElefteriu and @JohnBew at @Policy_Exchange. A good read twitter.com/SmartThi…

Note that @realDonaldTrump cannot unilaterally remove the US from #MATO, as he has apparently just threatened at #NATOsummit – as Douglas Lute told our event last month, it would have to be ratified by the Senate. twitter.com/Policy_E…

RT @SmartThinktanks If the UK gov’t takes the survival of NATO seriously, the bare minimum it must do is to commit to a graduated increase in defence spending that breaks free from the 2% threshold” write @JohnBew⁩ & ⁦@GElefteriu⁩ and Andrew Ehrhardt, w/ @Policy_Exchange: smartthinking.org.uk…

RT @SmartThinktanks OUT THIS WEEK: “Remaking the case for #NATO” by @JohnBew⁩ & ⁦@GElefteriu⁩ and Andrew Ehrhardt, with @Policy_Exchange. Read it here: smartthinking.org.uk…

Follow @Policy_Exchange

Read the full article ›

Posted in: Grey Literature on 07/16/2018 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2025 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice