Non-human Primate Studies Inform the Foundations of Fair and Just Human Institutions

Experiments with human participants have inspired new theories to capture human social, economic, and justice preferences,
and shed new light on the foundation of institutions that promote and support large-scale exchange. Another source of valuable
data for informing this agenda derives from studies with non-human primates. Here, we argue that primate studies of social
preferences provide behavioral evidence supporting the role of the brain as an evolved social record-keeping device. Our argument
follows Dickhaut et al. (Accounting Horizons 24:221–255, 2010), who pointed to record-keeping as critical in enabling large-scale trade. Here, we note that record-keeping also underlies
justice judgments in both personal exchange and large-scale trade. The reason is that evaluating whether an allocation is
just requires tracking not only benefits that accrue locally, but also benefits for distant others. Further, if record-keeping
is an evolved trait (as Dickhaut et al. in Accounting Horizons 24:221–255, 2010 suggest), then it seems reasonable to expect it to be evidenced not only in humans, but also in non-human primates. Indeed,
we argue that evidence from non-human primate research supports the Dickhaut hypothesis, thus supporting the role of justice
in the emergence of fair and efficient economic exchange.