Abstract: Gender inequalities in the financial resources in later life result from the combined effect of women’s atypical life courses, which include interrupted employment records and periods of care provision, and the fact that pension systems have generally been slow in mitigating ‘diversions’ from continuous and full-time working lives. Gender differentials in financial resources can often result in a greater likelihood of facing poverty for older women compared to older men, and such risk can be experienced for longer periods for women, as a result of their higher life expectancy on average. For example, across the EU-27, 16% of men compared to 23% of women aged 65 and over faced a poverty risk, and at age 65, men can expect to live another 17 years on average, while women another 21 years. Although modern pension systems are increasingly recognising the diversity of women’s patterns of paid and unpaid work, for example by accounting for periods of childcare in the calculation of the state pension, research continues to show a ‘penalty’ for women who have spent significant periods of their life providing care to children or dependent adults in and outside the household. Reducing such penalty is particularly important as population ageing and an increasing demand for formal and informal care are likely to present challenges with critical policy implications for societies and individuals alike.