Abstract
This article demonstrates how REBT has changed over time in terms of what is considered to be an irrational belief, in particular
how the concept of an irrational belief has been narrowed down. REBT is more of a goal oriented therapy as opposed to a cognitive
therapy, and is referred to as an intentional therapy. The ways in which one can dispute irrational beliefs intellectually
and in a more dynamic way are demonstrated. Attention is given to the provocative and confrontational way Albert Ellis did
therapy, which was not generally appreciated by the public but also not appreciated by some REBT therapists. Reasons why people
may dislike such a way of doing therapy are addressed. Some of the weaknesses of REBT are discussed and recommendations are
made to address these weaknesses.
how the concept of an irrational belief has been narrowed down. REBT is more of a goal oriented therapy as opposed to a cognitive
therapy, and is referred to as an intentional therapy. The ways in which one can dispute irrational beliefs intellectually
and in a more dynamic way are demonstrated. Attention is given to the provocative and confrontational way Albert Ellis did
therapy, which was not generally appreciated by the public but also not appreciated by some REBT therapists. Reasons why people
may dislike such a way of doing therapy are addressed. Some of the weaknesses of REBT are discussed and recommendations are
made to address these weaknesses.
- Content Type Journal Article
- Category Original Article
- Pages 1-9
- DOI 10.1007/s10942-011-0142-4
- Authors
- Wouter Backx, Instituut Voor Rationeel-Emotieve Training, P.O. Box 316, 2000 AH Haarlem, The Netherlands
- Journal Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
- Online ISSN 1573-6563
- Print ISSN 0894-9085