• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

information for practice

news, new scholarship & more from around the world


advanced search
  • gary.holden@nyu.edu
  • @ Info4Practice
  • Archive
  • About
  • Help
  • Browse Key Journals
  • RSS Feeds

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brief Intervention for Illicit Drugs Linked to the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) in clients recruited from primary health care settings in four countries

Abstract

Aims.  This study evaluated the effectiveness of a brief intervention (BI) for illicit drugs (cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants and opioids) linked to the WHO Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). The ASSIST screens for problem or risky use of 10 psychoactive substances,producing a score for each substance that falls into either a ‘low’, ‘moderate’ or ‘high’ risk category.

Design.  Prospective, randomized controlled trial in which participants were either assigned to a 3-month wait-list control condition or received brief motivational counseling lasting an average of 13.8 minutes for the drug receiving the highest ASSIST score.

Setting.  Primary health care settings in four countries: Australia, Brazil, India and the United States of America.

Participants.  731 males and females scoring within the moderate risk range of the ASSIST for cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants, or opioids.

Measurements.  ASSIST Specific Substance Involvement Scores for cannabis, stimulants or opioids, and, ASSIST Total Illicit Substance Involvement Score at baseline and 3 months post randomization.

Findings.  Omnibus analyses indicated that those receiving the BI had significantly reduced scores for all measures, compared with control participants. Country-specific analyses showed that, with the exception of the site in the United States, BI participants had significantly lower ASSIST Total Illicit Substance Involvement scores at follow-up compared with the control participants. The sites in India and Brazil demonstrated a very strong brief intervention effect for Cannabis Scores (p < 0.005 for both sites); as did the sites in Australia (p < 0.005) and Brazil (p < 0.05) for Stimulant Scores, and the Indian site for Opioid Scores (p < 0.01).

Conclusions.  The ASSIST-linked brief intervention aimed at reducing illicit substance use and related risks is effective at least in the short-term, and the effect generalises across countries.

Posted in: Journal Article Abstracts on 11/30/2011 | Link to this post on IFP |
Share

Primary Sidebar

Categories

Category RSS Feeds

  • Calls & Consultations
  • Clinical Trials
  • Funding
  • Grey Literature
  • Guidelines Plus
  • History
  • Infographics
  • Journal Article Abstracts
  • Meta-analyses - Systematic Reviews
  • Monographs & Edited Collections
  • News
  • Open Access Journal Articles
  • Podcasts
  • Video

© 1993-2026 Dr. Gary Holden. All rights reserved.

gary.holden@nyu.edu
@Info4Practice