The current anti-doping policy (‘war on doping’) resembles the ‘war on drugs’ in several aspects, including a zero-tolerance approach, ideology encroaching on human rights and public health principles, high cost using public money for repression and control, and attempts to shape internationally harmonized legal frameworks to attain its aim. Furthermore, even if for different reasons, both wars seem not to be able to attain their objectives, and possibly lead to more harm to society than they can prevent.The Olympic buzz is mounting and we can expect multiple headlines in the media on doping and anti-doping stories related to this event. In this article we describe current anti-doping policy, reflect on its multiple unplanned consequences, and end with a discussion, if lessons learned from harm reduction experiences in the illicit drugs field could be applied to anti-doping.
- Influence network linkages across implementation strategy conditions in a randomized controlled trial of two strategies for scaling up evidence-based practices in public youth-serving systems
- Bahrain Tortures Jailed Children Says Amnesty
- Disentangling Criminal Profiling: Accuracy, Homology, and the Myth of Trait-Based Profiling
- The Course of Sleep Disturbances in Early Alcohol Recovery: An Observational Cohort Study
- On Justification Work: How Compromising Enables Public Managers to Deal with Conflicting Values
Category Specific RSS