Clinical observations have suggested that children who experience physical or sexual abuse may provide indicators in their drawings that can distinguish them from nonabused children. Some have even suggested that a child’s drawings and the interpretive testimony of a trained mental health clinician should be admissible in court as evidence of a child’s abuse status. Many of these comments, however, may reflect a limited consideration of the available research. The current article provides a comprehensive literature review of the controlled research to determine whether any graphic indicators (e.g., genitalia, omission of body parts) or predefined scoring system can reliability and validly discriminate abused from nonabused children. Results indicate that, although individual studies have found support for various indicators or scoring systems, these results are rarely replicated, many times studies finding significant results suffer from serious methodological flaws and alternative explanations for findings (e.g., mental illness) are often present. No graphic indicator or scoring system possessed sufficient empirical evidence to support its use for identifying sexual or physical abuse. A discussion of the legal ramifications of these results is provided.
- Since Trajan and Decebalus: online media reporting of the 2010 GayFest in Bucharest
- The ideological roots of the support for welfare state reform: Support for distributive and commodifying reform in The Netherlands
- Communication During Conflict: Differences Between Individuals in First and Second Marriages
- Effects of Behaviour Change Communication Strategies Embedded in Social Marketing Programs on Health Behaviours and Related Health and Welfare Outcomes in Low and Middle Income Countries
- Men’s involvement in gender equality – European perspectives
Category Specific RSS