Scholars generally agree that interest groups are active and at times influential during the notice and comment period of regulatory policymaking (or “rulemaking”). But current research often ignores the agenda setting that may take place during the pre-proposal stage of rulemaking. During proposal development, interest groups may lobby to: (1) influence the content of proposed regulations or (2) block items from the regulatory agenda altogether. This article focuses on ex parte lobbying—”off the public record” conversations in which lobbyists share policy and political information with regulators—during the pre-proposal stage of rulemaking. I assess the importance of ex parte influence with data from a content analysis of government documents drawn from seven federal government agencies and a telephone survey of interested parties. Overall, the findings provide the first empirical confirmation that “off the record” lobbying can, and at times, does matter to regulatory content changes during a stage of the American policymaking process that is often overlooked by scholars and the public: the pre-proposal stage of agency rulemaking.
- Practitioners’ Views on the Role of Spirituality in Working With Women Victims and Survivors of Domestic Violence
- The Powerless Therapist and the Helpless Borderline: Acceptance, Aloneness, and Dyadic Joining
- In many places around the world, obesity in kids is on the rise
- Permanent work disability before and after ischaemic heart disease or stroke event: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Sweden
- “No Excuses” Charter Schools for Increasing Math and Literacy Achievement in Primary and Secondary Education
Category Specific RSS